WoundReference improves clinical decisions
 Choose the role that best describes you
WoundReference logo

Musculoskeletal Disorders and Ergonomic Interventions

Musculoskeletal Disorders and Ergonomic Interventions

Musculoskeletal Disorders and Ergonomic Interventions

INTRODUCTION

Overview

This topic is part of a document published by the U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), which is in the public domain and may be freely copied or reprinted.[1]

All healthcare workers who lift and move patients are at high risk for back injury and other musculoskeletal disorders.[2][3] A work-related musculoskeletal disorder is an injury of the muscles, tendons, ligaments, nerves, joints, cartilage, bones, or blood vessels in the extremities or back that is caused or aggravated by work tasks such as lifting, pushing, and pulling.[4] Symptoms of musculoskeletal disorders include pain, stiffness, swelling, numbness, and tingling.

Home healthcare workers do many of the same tasks as workers in traditional healthcare settings, but conditions in the home setting often make the work more difficult. For instance, home healthcare workers most often perform heavy work, like lifting and moving patients, without assistance.[5]

The following sections define the scope of the problem, discuss risk factors for developing musculoskeletal disorders in home healthcare work, and suggest ways to prevent musculoskeletal disorders.

Background

Relevance

What is the impact of musculoskeletal disorders on the home healthcare industry?

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are a serious problem in the home healthcare industry.[6] Sprains and strains were the most common lost-work-time injuries to home healthcare workers in 2007.[7] Home healthcare workers may injure themselves when transferring patients into and out of bed or when assisting patients walking or standing.[8] The rate of injury from lifting in 2007 for home healthcare workers was 20.5 per 10,000 workers.[9] Compared with other workers, home healthcare workers take more frequent sick leave as a result of work-related musculoskeletal symptoms.[10][11][12]

Risk factors

Healthcare workers can develop musculoskeletal disorders from any number of common work activities,[13] including the following:

  • Forceful exertions (activities that require a person to apply high levels of force, such as during lifting, pushing, or pulling heavy loads)
  • Awkward postures when lifting
  • Repeated activities without adequate recovery time
Patient-handling tasks often involve motions that challenge a home healthcare worker’s body including twisting, bending, stretching, reaching, and other awkward postures. The most frequent causes of back pain and other injuries among nursing staff (in home healthcare and in hospitals) are lifting and moving patients (“patient transfers”) and bathing, dressing, and feeding patients [4][14][2]. Healthcare workers who spend the most time transferring, bathing, and dressing patients have the highest rates of musculoskeletal injuries [11][15][16]. In a NIOSH survey study of home healthcare workers, these tasks were identified as significant predictors of pain in the back, neck, shoulders, legs and feet, after adjusting for other factors such as the workers’ age, weight, and physical activities outside of work.[3] It has been found that frequent heavy lifting, lifting in awkward postures, and lifting without assistance were significant predictors of permanent work disability in home healthcare workers.

What are some factors that complicate patient transfers?
  • Incapacity is common among home healthcare patients; about 40% of them have one or more functional limitations because patients are being released after shorter hospital stays and require more intensive care during recovery at home.[17]
  • Healthcare workers are commonly required to lift and move patients weighing 90 to 250 pounds. These weights exceed the NIOSH safe lifting limits for both men and women.[18]
  • The body weight of a patient is not evenly distributed, nor does a body have convenient hand-holds.
  • The patient may be connected to a catheter, I.V., or other equipment, resulting in awkward postures for workers involved in his or her transfer.
  • The functional limitations of the patient— physical, mental, or both—may interfere with the lift:
    • The patient may not be able to hold himself or herself up.
    • The patient may not be cooperative.
    • The patient may be obese (body mass index > 30).[19]
  • Certain lifting techniques used to minimize the load on the back may increase the load on other body parts such as the neck, shoulders, and arms.[20]
What factors contribute to awkward postures?
  • Rooms in patients’ homes are often small or crowded, and workers must often use awkward postures during patient care and transfer tasks.[5] Between 40 and 48% of the home healthcare workers’ time may be spent in poor posture combinations, including forward-bent and twisted postures that are associated with shoulder, neck, and back complaints.[21][22][23] Shoulder and neck symptoms in home healthcare workers have been shown to be due to poor postures and forceful exertions during patient care tasks.[24][25][26][22][20][10][27]
  • Beds may not be adjustable, preventing the worker from raising or lowering the patient to the best position for a proper lift.[28] found that problems with the bed’s height, width, placement, and non-adjustability were frequently cited by home healthcare workers as major sources of back stress.

What other factors contribute to musculoskeletal disorders?

  • Patients’ homes usually do not have equipment to help with transfers.
  • Home healthcare workers frequently endure long periods of standing or walking.

PREVENTION

Can anything help limit musculoskeletal disorders?

The science of work design is called ergonomics. Ergonomics is the design of the work setting (including furniture, tools, equipment, and tasks) to help position the worker in a way that will lesson the possibility of injury when performing work tasks. Therefore, the ergonomics approach optimizes the worker’s safety, health, and performance.

Researchers have found that help from a second trained person reduces the risk of injury during patient-handling tasks but not enough to make the tasks acceptably safe.[29]  manual patient handling is “an extremely hazardous job that had substantial risk of causing a low-back injury whether with one or two patient handlers.” For this reason, ergonomic intervention, including the use of electronic and mechanical devices to help with patient transfers, is the most promising approach for reducing low-back injuries during patient handling.

Comprehensive ergonomic interventions using appropriate equipment and training have resulted in dramatic reductions in the incidence and severity of musculoskeletal injuries among healthcare workers. For example, in one study [14], a “zero-lift” program was implemented in seven nursing homes and one hospital to eliminate manual patient transfers: Hoists and other equipment were used to lift patients rather than lifting manually. Injuries related to patient transfers were reduced 39%–79%. Other reductions were noted in the average number of lost workdays (86%), restricted workdays (64%), and workers’ compensation costs (84%). In a review of patient-handling intervention research,[30] identified 21 studies, conducted from 1982 through 2001, that evaluated patient-handling equipment and equipment training. Of the 21 studies, 16 (76%) reported positive effects including reductions in injuries, lost workdays, spinal loads, harmful postures, perceived exertion, and staffing requirements. Subsequent studies have cited similar positive effects for healthcare workers as well as positive effects on the quality of patient care.[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] Nelson et al. summarize numerous other case studies using ergonomic interventions in hospitals and nursing homes that have also shown large reductions in injury rates, workers’ compensation costs, medical costs, insurance premiums, and lost and restricted workdays.[19] 

Whenever possible, devices should be used to help with patient transfers. Various devices such as draw sheets, slide boards, rollers, slings, belts, and mechanical or electronic hoists (to lift the patient) have been designed to assist healthcare workers and patients. The main lesson to be learned from studies about such devices is that each home situation must be assessed separately to find out which device will be the most suitable for (1) the persons using it, (2) the place(s) it will be used, and (3) the task(s) for which it will be used.[40][15][41] Recognizing the importance of ergonomics for protecting the safety of healthcare workers, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has issued ergonomics guidelines for nursing homes that emphasize the proper use of assistive devices during patient handling.[42] In addition, the VISN 8 Patient Safety Center of Inquiry[43] has published a resource guide about safe patient handling and movement. The guide describes assistive devices and elements of an ergonomics program that have been tested within the Veterans’ Health Administration and are being used on an ongoing basis at many other inpatient healthcare facilities. Some of the information from these sources is specific to nursing homes and hospitals, yet much of it applies to home healthcare. Parsons [44][45] has written two articles specifically about preventing musculoskeletal disorders in home healthcare workers.

Figures 1 through 10 provide examples of assistive devices that can be used in home settings. Many more types of products designed for a variety of patient-handling and other home healthcare needs are commercially available. Patients, family members, and home healthcare workers should consult with equipment vendors and the patient’s primary doctor to select proper assistive devices that will lessen the worker’s strain without decreasing the patient’s safety or comfort. In some cases, a prescription is required to get such devices. Generally, a patient’s insurance at least partially covers the costs. It’s most important that all persons who use a lifting device be fully trained to use it safely. Periodic maintenance and cleaning for some devices, such as hoists, are required.

What can I do to prevent musculoskeletal disorders?

Some simple solutions have greatly reduced the number of patient transfers that nursing personnel need to perform. For example, a study found that using a hoist with a built-in weighing scale eliminated transfers for the sole purpose of weighing the patient (from wheelchair to weighing scale and from weighing scale to wheelchair) and using a rolling toileting or showering chair reduced the six transfers needed for toileting and showering (bed to wheelchair, wheelchair to toilet, toilet to wheelchair, wheelchair to bathtub, bathtub to wheelchair, and wheelchair to bed) to two transfers (bed to toileting/showering chair and toileting/showering chair to bed).[40] 

Equipment such as adjustable beds, raised toilet seats, shower chairs, and grab bars are also helpful for reducing musculoskeletal risk factors. This type of equipment keeps the patient at an acceptable lift height and allows the patient to help himself or herself during transfer when possible.

Even when assistive devices are used during patient care, it is impossible to completely eliminate the need for some amount of physical exertion. For example, when using a hoist, the healthcare worker must move the patient in order to fasten the sling, and workers must support and balance the patient while using hoists and other devices. These tasks will always pose some risk of injury.[43] To lessen the risk, certain principles of body mechanics should be followed as much as possible to avoid harmful postures.[46][47][40][16][19] Some strategies for effective body mechanics in patient handling are described in the Recommendations for Workers.

Figure 2 .1 . Slide/tranfer board (Copyright by Sammons Preston Rolyan. Reprinted with permission.)

Figure 1 . Slide/transfer board (Copyright by Sammons Preston Rolyan. Reprinted with permission.)


Figure 2 .2 . Slide/draw sheet (Copyright by SureHands Lift and Care Systems. Reprinted with permission.)

Figure 2. Slide/draw sheet (Copyright by SureHands Lift and Care Systems. Reprinted with permission.)


Figure 2 .3 . Patient moving sling (Copyright by Sam- mons Preston Rolyan. Reprinted with permission.)

Figure 3 . Patient moving sling (Copyright by Sammons Preston Rolyan. Reprinted with permission.)


Figure 2 .4 . Rolling toilet/shower chair (Copyright by Sammons Preston Rolyan. Reprinted with permission.)

Figure 4 . Rolling toilet/shower chair (Copyright by Sammons Preston Rolyan. Reprinted with permission.)


Figure 2 .5 . Gait/walking belt (Copyright by Sammons Preston Rolyan. Reprinted with permission.)

Figure 5 . Gait/walking belt (Copyright by Sammons Preston Rolyan. Reprinted with permission.)


Figure 2 .6 . Stationary shower chair (Copyright by Sam- mons Preston Rolyan. Reprinted with permission.)

Figure 6 . Stationary shower chair (Copyright by Sammons Preston Rolyan. Reprinted with permission.)


Figure 2 .7 . Raised toilet seat (Copyright by Sammons Preston Rolyan. Reprinted with permission.)

Figure 7 . Raised toilet seat (Copyright by Sammons Preston Rolyan. Reprinted with permission.)


Figure 8 . Grab bars (Copyright by Sammons Preston Rolyan. Reprinted with permission.)


Figure 2 .9 . Rotation disk (Copyright by Sure Hands Lift and Care Systems. Reprinted with permission.)

Figure 9 . Rotation disk (Copyright by Sure Hands Lift and Care Systems. Reprinted with permission.)


Figure 10 . Wall sling (Copyright by Sure Hands Lift and Care Systems. Reprinted with permission.)


Recommendations for Employers

  • Consult with a professional with expertise in patient-care ergonomics to determine when assistive devices are necessary and to provide training on proper use of the equipment.
  • Provide ergonomic training for workers.
  • Evaluate each patient-care plan to determine whether ergonomic assistive devices are appropriate.
  • Provide ergonomic assistive devices when needed.
  • Reassess the training, the care plan, and the assistive devices once installed and in use by the caregiver.

Bringing ergonomic approaches into home healthcare settings is challenging because of the following:

  • Workers may think assistive devices will be difficult to work with and time-consuming.
  • Patients and family caregivers may fear that assistive devices will be unsafe or uncomfortable.
  • Patients and families may be unwilling or unable to accept changes in the home.
  • A device may be too expensive for the patient and family.
If patients and families are resistant to installing or buying an assistive device, the employers should inform them about the risks involved in moving patients when a device is not used. These risks may include the following:
  • An overexerted worker could accidentally harm the patient.
  • The patient may be injured by being dropped, jared, or not properly handled during unassisted transfers.

Recommendations for Workers

Workers can follow these recommendations [46][47][16][19]:

  • Use ergonomic assistive devices if they are available.
  • Move along the side of the patient’s bed to stay in safe postures while performing tasks at the bedside. Do not stand in one location while bending, twisting, and reaching to perform tasks.
  • When you are manually moving the patient, stand as close as possible to the patient without twisting your back, keeping your knees bent and feet apart. To avoid rotating the spine, make sure one foot is in the direction of the move.
  • Use a friction-reducing device such as a slip sheet whenever possible.[19] Using gentle rocking motions can also reduce exertion while moving a patient.
  • Pulling a patient up in bed is easier when the head of the bed is flat or down. Raising the patient’s knees and encouraging the patient to push (if possible) can also help.
  • Apply anti-embolism stockings by pushing them on while standing at the foot of the bed. This position reduces exertion compared with standing at the side of the bed.
Notify your employer if you feel you would benefit from additional training or ergonomic assistive devices.

RESOURCES

  • CDC. Preventing falls among seniors (topic page) [www.cdc.gov/ncipc/duip/spotlite/fallpub.htm].
  • NIOSH [2006]. Safe lifting and movement of nursing home residents. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2006–117 [www.cdc.gov./niosh/docs/2006–117/].
  • OSHA. Healthcare wide hazards module— ergonomics [www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/ hospital/hazards/ergo/ergo.html].
Official reprint from WoundReference® woundreference.com ©2024 Wound Reference, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Use of WoundReference is subject to the Subscription and License Agreement. ​
NOTE: This is a controlled document. This document is not a substitute for proper training, experience, and exercising of professional judgment. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the contents, neither the authors nor the Wound Reference, Inc. give any guarantee as to the accuracy of the information contained in them nor accept any liability, with respect to loss, damage, injury or expense arising from any such errors or omissions in the contents of the work.

REFERENCES

  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health et al. Occupational Hazards in Home Healthcare . 2010;.
  2. Owen B. The epidemic of back injuries in health care workers in the U.S. In: Charney W, Fragala G, eds. The epidemic of health care worker injury: an epidemiology Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC. 1999;.
  3. Waters T, Collins J, Galinsky T, Caruso C et al. NIOSH research efforts to prevent musculoskeletal disorders in the healthcare industry. Orthopedic nursing. 2006;volume 25(6):380-9.
  4. Orr GB. Ergonomics programs for health care organizations. Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.). 1997;volume 12(4):687-700.
  5. Myers A, Jensen RC, Nestor D, Rattiner J et al. Low back injuries among home health aides compared with hospital nursing aides. Home health care services quarterly. 1993;volume 14(2-3):149-55.
  6. Galinsky T, Waters T, Malit B et al. Overexertion injuries in home health care workers and the need for ergonomics. Home health care services quarterly. 2001;volume 20(3):57-73.
  7. . Table R5. Incidence rates for nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses involving days away from work per 10,000 full-time workers by industry and selected natures of injury or illness, 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. LS [2008a]. Table R5. 2008;.
  8. El-Askari E and DeBaun B. The occupational haz- ards of home health care. In Charney W., Fragula G. eds. The epidemic of health care worker injury: an epidemiology. Boca Ratonm FL: CRC Press. 1999;.
  9. . Incidence rates for nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses involving days away from work per 10,000 full-time workers by industry and selected events or exposures leading to injury or illness, 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics BLS [2008 b]. Table R8. 2008;.
  10. Brulin C, Goine H, Edlund C, Knutsson A [1998a] et al. Prevalence of long-term sick leave among female home care personnel in northern Sweden. J Occup Rehab 8(2):103–111. 1998;.
  11. Moens G, Dohogne T, Jacques P et al. Occupation and the prevalence of back pain among employees in health care Arch Public Health. 1994;volume 52():189–201.
  12. Ono Y, Lagerström M, Hagberg M, Lindén A, Malker B et al. Reports of work related musculoskeletal injury among home care service workers compared with nursery school workers and the general population of employed women in Sweden. Occupational and environmental medicine. 1995;volume 52(10):686-93.
  13. . Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors. A critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) NIOSH. 1997;.
  14. . Long-term effectiveness of “zero-lift programs” in seven nursing homes and one hospital. By Garg A. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, NIOSH Contract Report No. U60/ CCU512089–02. NIOSH. 1999;.
  15. Zelenka JP, Floren AE, Jordan JJ et al. Minimal forces to move patients. The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupationa.... 1996;volume 50(5):354-61.
  16. Nelson A, Gross C, Lloyd J et al. Preventing musculoskeletal injuries in nurses: directions for future research. SCI nursing : a publication of the American Association of Spinal Cord Injury Nurses. 1997;volume 14(2):45-51.
  17. Jarrell RB. Home care workers: injury prevention through risk factor reduction. Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.). 1997;volume 12(4):757-66.
  18. Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A, Fine LJ et al. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics. 1993;volume 36(7):749-76.
  19. Nelson A, Lloyd JD, Menzel N, Gross C et al. Preventing nursing back injuries: redesigning patient handling tasks. AAOHN journal : official journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses. 2003;volume 51(3):126-34.
  20. Knibbe JJ, Friele RD et al. Prevalence of back pain and characteristics of the physical workload of community nurses. Ergonomics. 1996;volume 39(2):186-98.
  21. Pohjonen T, Punakallio A, Louhevaara V et al. Participatory ergonomics for reducing load and strain in home care work Int J Ind Ergonomics. 1998;volume 21():345–352.
  22. Torgén M, Nygård CH, Kilbom A et al. Physical work load, physical capacity and strain among elderly female aides in home-care service. European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology. 1995;volume 71(5):444-52.
  23. Brulin C, Gerdle B, Granlund B, Höög J, Knutson A, Sundelin G et al. Physical and psychosocial work-related risk factors associated with musculoskeletal symptoms among home care personnel. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences. 1998;volume 12(2):104-10.
  24. NIOSH. Health hazard evaluation and technical assistance report: Alameda County Public Authority for In-Home Support Services, Alameda California. By Baron S, Habes D. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety Health, NIOSH HETA Report No. 2001–0139–2930. . 2004;.
  25. Elert J, Brulin C, Gerdle B, Johansson H et al. Mechanical performance, level of continuous contraction and muscle pain symptoms in home care personnel. Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. 1992;volume 24(3):141-50.
  26. Johansson JA. Psychosocial work factors, physical work load and associated musculoskeletal symptoms among home care workers. Scandinavian journal of psychology. 1995;volume 36(2):113-29.
  27. Meyer JD, Muntaner C et al. Injuries in home health care workers: an analysis of occupational morbidity from a state compensation database. American journal of industrial medicine. 1999;volume 35(3):295-301.
  28. Owen BD, Staehler KS et al. Decreasing back stress in home care. Home healthcare nurse. 2003;volume 21(3):180-6.
  29. Marras WS, Davis KG, Kirking BC, Bertsche PK et al. A comprehensive analysis of low-back disorder risk and spinal loading during the transferring and repositioning of patients using different techniques. Ergonomics. 1999;volume 42(7):904-26.
  30. Hignett S. Intervention strategies to reduce musculoskeletal injuries associated with handling patients: a systematic review. Occupational and environmental medicine. 2003;volume 60(9):E6.
  31. Spiegel J, Yassi A, Ronald LA, Tate RB, Hacking P, Colby T et al. Implementing a resident lifting system in an extended care hospital. Demonstrating cost-benefit. AAOHN journal : official journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses. 2002;volume 50(3):128-34.
  32. Evanoff B, Wolf L, Aton E, Canos J, Collins J et al. Reduction in injury rates in nursing personnel through introduction of mechanical lifts in the workplace. American journal of industrial medicine. 2003;volume 44(5):451-7.
  33. Collins JW, Wolf L, Bell J, Evanoff B et al. An evaluation of a "best practices" musculoskeletal injury prevention program in nursing homes. Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Preven.... 2004;volume 10(4):206-11.
  34. Chhokar R, Engst C, Miller A, Robinson D, Tate RB, Yassi A et al. The three-year economic benefits of a ceiling lift intervention aimed to reduce healthcare worker injuries. Applied ergonomics. 2005;volume 36(2):223-9.
  35. Engst C, Chhokar R, Miller A, Tate RB, Yassi A et al. Effectiveness of overhead lifting devices in reducing the risk of injury to care staff in extended care facilities. Ergonomics. 2005;volume 48(2):187-99.
  36. Fujishiro K, Weaver JL, Heaney CA, Hamrick CA, Marras WS et al. The effect of ergonomic interventions in healthcare facilities on musculoskeletal disorders. American journal of industrial medicine. 2005;volume 48(5):338-47.
  37. Santaguida PL, Pierrynowski M, Goldsmith C, Fernie G et al. Comparison of cumulative low back loads of caregivers when transferring patients using overhead and floor mechanical lifting devices. Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon). 2005;volume 20(9):906-16.
  38. Nelson A, Matz M, Chen F, Siddharthan K, Lloyd J, Fragala G et al. Development and evaluation of a multifaceted ergonomics program to prevent injuries associated with patient handling tasks. International journal of nursing studies. 2006;volume 43(6):717-33.
  39. Nelson A, Collins J, Siddharthan K, Matz M, Waters T et al. Link between safe patient handling and patient outcomes in long-term care. Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses. 2008;volume 33(1):33-43.
  40. Garg A, Owen B et al. Reducing back stress to nursing personnel: an ergonomic intervention in a nursing home. Ergonomics. 1992;volume 35(11):1353-75.
  41. Elford W, Straker L, Strauss G et al. Patient handling with and without slings: an analysis of the risk of injury to the lumbar spine. Applied ergonomics. 2000;volume 31(2):185-200.
  42. . Ergonomics: guidelines for nursing homes Washington, D.C. U.S. Department of Labor: Occupational Safety and Health Administration OSHA. 2003;.
  43. . Resource guide: safe patient handling and movement VISN 8 Patient Safety Center of Inquiry. 2007;.
  44. Parsons KS, Galinsky TL, Waters T et al. Suggestions for preventing musculoskeletal disorders in home healthcare workers. Part 1: lift and transfer assistance for partially weight-bearing home care patients. Home healthcare nurse. 2006;volume 24(3):158-64; quiz 165-6.
  45. Parsons KS, Galinsky TL, Waters T et al. Suggestions for preventing musculoskeletal disorders in home healthcare workers. Part 2: lift and transfer assistance for non-weight-bearing home care patients. Home healthcare nurse. 2006;volume 24(4):227-33; quiz 234-5.
  46. Owen B, Garg A et al. Assistive devices for use with patient handling tasks. In: Das B, ed. Advances in industrial ergonomics and safety. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis. 1990;.
  47. Zhuang Z, Stobbe TJ, Hsiao H, Collins JW, Hobbs GR et al. Biomechanical evaluation of assistive devices for transferring residents. Applied ergonomics. 1999;volume 30(4):285-94.
Topic 2426 Version 1.0

RELATED TOPICS

Occupational StressIntroductionHome healthcare work involves challenges that are not present in hospital or other in- patient healthcare settings. Not many stud- ies have looked into stress levels of home healthcare workers, but the few studies that have show that home healthcare may be quite stressful. The home setting may in- volve stressors, such as lack of control over work planning, that are risks for shoulder and neck pain, especially when combined with physical risk f

Violence in The WorkplaceIntroductionServing patients in the community is the essence of home healthcare. Yet, the com- munity setting makes home healthcare pro- viders more vulnerable to violent assaults. Home healthcare workers face an unpro- tected and unpredictable environment each time they enter the patient’s community and home. According to estimates of the Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (SOII) [BLS 2007a], 330 nonfatal assaults on home healt

Exposure to Other Hazards7.1 Introduction

Handling Medical WasteOverviewHealthcare settings, including hospitals, doctor's offices, dental clinics, blood banks, veterinary clinics, and research labs, produce various kinds of medical waste. As someone working in healthcare, you might encounter these wastes directly in your role, whether you're involved in patient care, housekeeping, maintenance, or other tasks. It's important to note that some medical waste can pose health risks. This training aims to outline the potenti

t
-->