WoundReference improves clinical decisions
 Choose the role that best describes you
Byun YJ, Patel J, Nguyen SA, Lambert PR, et al.
World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery. Date of publication 2020 May 4;volume 7(4):296-302.
1. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 May 4;7(4):296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.04.002. eCollection 2021 Oct. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in malignant otitis externa: A systematic review of the literature. Byun YJ(1)(2), Patel J(1), Nguyen SA(1), Lambert PR(1). Author information: (1)Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. (2)University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL, USA. OBJECTIVE: To review the role of adjuvant hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in the treatment of malignant otitis externa (MOE). DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library were searched for the following concepts: "hyperbaric oxygen" and "malignant or necrotizing otitis externa." METHODS: Studies were included if they contained (1) patients with reported evidence of MOE, (2) employment of adjuvant HBOT, (3) details on patients' medical condition, and (4) documented survival outcomes. Extracted information included patient demographics, underlying medical conditions, infectious etiology, signs and symptoms, medical and surgical treatments, duration of medical treatment, mean follow up time, HBOT setting, number of HBOT sessions, complications, survival rate, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies comprising 58 patients (mean age 68.0 years) were included. Diabetes was present in 94.7% of cases and Pseudomonas spp (64.3%) was the most common infectious agent. Cranial nerve VII was involved in 55.2% of cases. Overall, the disease cure rate with adjuvant HBOT was 91.4% and all-cause mortality was 8.6%. Among those who had cranial nerve VII involvement, 72.0% had return of function and 93.8% of them survived. CONCLUSION: HBOT may be an effective treatment option for refractory or advanced MOE but its efficacy remains unproven due to lack of strong scientific evidence. However, its therapeutic value should not be underestimated given good results and few adverse events reported in this study. © 2020 The Authors. DOI: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2020.04.002 PMCID: PMC8486695 PMID: 34632343
Appears in following Topics:
Chronic Refractory Osteomyelitis
t
-->